Public Policy Proposal

🏛️ Public Policy Proposal: Preconception Genetic Selection for Future Mental Health

A Policy Framework to Prevent Inherited Mental Suffering While Respecting Life and Ethics


---

🧠 1. Policy Title

"The Compassionate Conception Act"
Using science to prevent suffering, without destroying embryos.


---

🎯 2. Objective

To reduce the incidence of severe inherited mental health conditions by providing voluntary, ethical preconception genetic screening and gamete selection, funded and regulated by the state.


---

🧬 3. Core Principles

Compassion: Prevent inherited suffering before it begins

Respect for Life: No embryo destruction; selection occurs before conception

Voluntary Participation: No coercion — only informed, parent-led choices

Equality: Universal access regardless of income, race, or religion

Transparency and Oversight: Ethics boards and public reporting



---

🧩 4. Program Components

A. Preconception Genetic Screening

Offer free or subsidized full-genome sequencing of parental gametes (sperm and eggs)

Identify combinations likely to produce embryos at high risk of:

Major depression

Schizophrenia

Bipolar disorder

Autism with severe impairment

Other severe neuropsychiatric or degenerative disorders



B. Simulated Embryo Matching

Use AI to model all possible sperm–egg pairings

Generate a ranked list of combinations based on:

Lowest cumulative genetic risk

Highest predicted cognitive and emotional resilience


Present this to parents before fertilization — no embryo created yet


C. Ethical Conception Process

Only the optimal sperm and egg are combined via IVF

No destruction of embryos

No editing of genes — just selection



---

🧾 5. Implementation Strategy

Phase 1: Government-funded pilot programs in major cities

Phase 2: Full national rollout in public hospitals and clinics

Partner with biotech companies and ethical AI labs

Establish a National Bioethics Commission to regulate, monitor, and report annually



---

💵 6. Economic Justification

Treating chronic mental illness costs governments billions annually

Preventing suffering before birth leads to:

Fewer hospitalizations

Reduced suicide rates

Increased workforce participation

Stronger families, less poverty


Every $1 invested in prevention may save $50–100 in future social costs



---

🛡️ 7. Safeguards and Protections

No use of this system for aesthetic or cosmetic traits

Strong data privacy laws: no gamete genome sharing with third parties

Parental informed consent required

No discrimination against people born without screening

Publicly available audit logs and ethical reviews



---

🌍 8. Why This Is Acceptable Across Cultures

No embryo killing → acceptable to most religious and conservative communities

Seen not as eugenics, but as preventative public health

Frames technology as an act of love and responsibility, not control



---

✊ 9. Call to Action

We urge parliaments, ministries of health, and ethical commissions to:

✅ Fund and pilot preconception genetic selection
✅ Create national bioethics and oversight boards
✅ Include diverse voices: scientists, parents, religious leaders, ethicists
✅ Shift the conversation from fear of genetics to hope through prevention


---

🔚 10. Conclusion

This policy provides a middle path:

Between suffering and joy

Between progress and ethics

Between science and human dignity


Let us choose the best of nature — before conception — and create a future without preventable mental torment.